Al Moroccan Consulate v. LAKE PROPERTIES 103 LLC

Al Moroccan Empire Consulate at New Jersey State Republic
Lenapehoking State / Al Morocco / Maghreb Al Aqsa
The True and De jure Natural Peoples ~ Heirs of the Land
N. 41.35816° N, 74.69449° W, NE: 41.01461° N, 73.90802° W, SE: 40.40077° N, 73.89027° W, S: 40.07497° N, 74.86878° W, W: 40.95182° N, 75.26969° W
Consular Court
International Document
7-Rabi al awwal-1441 [October 14, 2021]
Communication No. 2

The following information from the Registry of Al Moroccan Empire Consulate Court of Justice has been communicated to the Press:

The Al Moroccan Empire Consulate Court of Justice on the 6th day of Rabi al-awwal, 1441 M.C.Y. [October 13, 2021 C.C.Y.] delivered judgment in the case concerning the Rights of El, Jaleel-Hu, Cónsul General of the Al Moroccan Empire Consulate, a Public Moroccan Minister in Morocco, proceedings in which were instituted against Jacob Tauber of LAKE PROPERTIES 103 LLC by an action in Consular Court authorized by the Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1836 between the United States of America and the Moroccan Empire [Public Law 856 Chapter 807].

The submission of the parties relates to the following principal points:

The action instituted El, Jaleel-Hu, representing the Al Moroccan Empire Consulate in the City of Tanjeer against Jacob Tauber of the LAKE PROPERTIES LLC 103 residing in the City of Ramsey in the State of New Jersey of the United States Corporation – Case Number AMEC-20210920-JHE;

The extent of the Consular Court jurisdiction which the Al Moroccan Empire Consulate of the City of Tanjeer may exercise in Morocco;

The right to levy the property known as 67-69 Lincoln Park, City of Newark, State of New Jersey held by citizens of the United States in the State of New Jersey with particular reference to Jacob Tauber of the LAKE PROPERTIES LLC 103 residing in the City of Ramsey in the State of New Jersey (14th Amendment US citizens) due to default judgment entered into the public records of Morocco.

In its judgment delivered on the 6th day of Rabi al-awwal, the Court held:

Public Law 856 Chapter 807 of August 1, 1956, exempted Moroccan Nationals from United States jurisdiction; while the United States was subjected to such jurisdiction; Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the relinquishment by the President, at such time as he considers this appropriate, of the consular jurisdiction of the United States in Morocco is here by approved and sections 1693, 4083 to 4091, inclusive, 4097 to 4122, inclusive, and 4125 to 4130, inclusive, of the Revised Statutes, as amended, are repealed effective upon the date which the President determines to be appropriate for the relinquishment of such jurisdiction, except so far as may be necessary to dispose of cases then pending in the consular courts in Morocco. Jacob Tauber of the LAKE PROPERTIES LLC 103 residing in the City of Ramsey in the State of New Jersey, that their jurisdictional and territorial claims of aforementioned property in the United States over El, Jaleel-Hu, Cónsul General of the Al Moroccan Empire Consulate, must be rejected.
With regard to consular jurisdiction in Morocco, the United States is entitled to exercise such jurisdiction in accordance with the terms of its Treaty with Morocco of September 16, 1836, that is to say, in all disputes, civil or criminal, between citizens or prodigies of the United States. But the other submissions of the United States relating to consular jurisdiction are rejected: it is not entitled to exercise consular jurisdiction in other cases in Morocco. Its right in this connection, which were acquired solely by the effect of the most favored nation clause, came to an end with determination by great Britain of all its rights and privileges of a capitulatory character by the Franco-British convention of 1937.

The United States had contended that its nationals were not subject, in principle, to the application of Moroccan laws, unless these laws had received his prior assent. There is, however, no provision in any of the Treaties conferring upon the United States such a right, a right linked with the régime of capitulations which can only exist as a corollary of consular jurisdiction, so that if the co-operation of the United States Consular Courts is required to enforce a law (see 2 and 3 above), the assent of the United States is ill founded. If the application of a law to citizens of the Morocco without its assent is

contrary to international law, any dispute which may arise there from should be dealt with according to the ordinary methods for the settlement of international disputes.
Citizens of the United States must provide proof of purchase in accordance with the prerequisites of Right of Protection in Morocco or proof of registration of deeds providing the privilege to acquire (hold) property throughout the Shereefian Empire for inspection purposes with the prerequisites of the General Act of Algeciras. Since neither of the evidence was provided to justify their claims to said property, their acquiescence is prima facie evidence that their possession of said property was unlawful and invalid.

A declaration is appended to the judgment by Justice El, Jaleel-Hu, who expresses the opinion that the Jacob Tauber of the LAKE PROPERTIES LLC 103 residing in the City of Ramsey in the State of New Jersey of the United States Corporation is only entitled to exercise jurisdiction in cases involving the actions against Moorish Americans nationals of those provisions of Article 20, 21 and 22 of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1836 between the United States of America and the Moroccan Empire.

A joint dissent opinion, signed by Justice Jones-Bey, Desmond, is also appended to the Judgment.